AntiqueCameras.net

Home

World Camera

Sell Equipment

About

Rolleiflex History

STORE

Blog

Blog84

Blog85

Blog86

Blog87

Blog88

Blog89

Blog90

Blog91

Blog92

Blog93

Blog94

Blog95

Blog 96

Blog 97

Blog 98

Blog 99

Camera & Lens Information

Antique Wood Cameras

Photographers 1860-1900

ROC Universal Camera

No 5 Folding Kodak

1895 Sunart Camera

1883 Blair Envelope

Petzval Lens

Voigtlander Lenses

Heliar Lenses

Soft Focus Lenses

Soft Focus Lenses 2

Soft Focus Lenses 3

Soft Focus Lens Sales

Soft Focus Lens Test

Ross Lenses

Harrison Globe Lens

Bohmke Lenses

Prosch Shutters

1857 CC Harrison Lens

Bokeh

Leica M Lenses

Leica M Cameras

50 Summicron-M Lenses

35 Summicron-M Lenses

Leica 28mm M-Lenses

Leica Screw Lenses

Leica Screw Cameras

Leica Lens Reviews

Leica R Lenses

Canon RF Cameras

Canon RF Lens

Canon 50mm F/1.2 LTM

Minolta-35 RF

Nikon RF Lens

Zeiss Contax RF Lens

Rolleiflex

Rolleicords

Rolleiflex Buying Tip

Ricohflex

Hasselblad 6x6

Hasselblad C Lenses

Super Ikonta

Fuji 6x7 & 6x9

Fuji 617

Pentax M42 Lens

Pentax 6x7 Lenses

Fuji 645 Cameras

Sonnar Lens

Olympus Stylus Epic

Contax G Lens

Photo History 1888

Antique Advertisements

1848-1875 Advertisements

1871 Camera Catalog

1876 Scovill Lens Catalog

1891 Dallmeyer Lens Ads

1892 Zeiss Lens Ads

1892 Steinheil Lens Ads

1890 Lens Catalogue

1904 Goerz Lens Ads

1904 Dallmeyer Lens Ads

1904 Busch Lens Ads

1910 Premo Catalog

Camera Valuations

$ 12 Sample

Valuation Payment Page

Lens Vade Mecum

Camera Books

Links

Join our E-Mail List

Terms & Conditions

Shipping & Payment Info

Privacy Policy

Return Policy

SEARCH

 A Tip for Buying a Rolleiflex Online or From Photographs

An excellent indicator of a Rolleiflex’s amount of previous use is the condition of the original paint on the crank side of the camera. The circular rim around the crank, and on later models, the small “button” are two spots to check to judge a Rolleiflex's general condition. The yellow box below indicates the area.  The red arrows highlight typical wear points on a Rolleiflex to look for.


Area to Examine
 
Below is a camera that has seen heavy use. It took a lot of cranks to wear all that paint off.

 
The wear below shows modest to moderate use of the camera.  I would suggest that cameras graded as being in "EXCELLENT" condition should look similiar to this, but no worse than this.

 
 
Below is a camera that has been barely used and would likely grade at least EXCELLENT PLUS if not MINT- 

 
 
 As a Rolleiflex is "cranked," the user's hand, thumb, glove – whatever - rubs up against the “button” and the crank's edge. Over time, that repeated friction and abrasion cause paint wear and eventual loss. A minor amount of paint loss can also come from the camera being taking in and out of the leather case.  In any event, I have found a large correlation between the condition of the paint finish in these two areas and the camera's overall condition. The more wear on that paint, the more likely the camera has been heavily used more and correspondingly, the lower value the camera should be as it will likely need work/repair/CLA or should be avoided.

A “minty” camera will have absolutely NO paint loss in these areas - in fact, the paint shouldn't show ANY marks or abrasions in the paint at all.  The paint should have an unbroken, beautiful, soft gloss, enamel paint finish.


 
 
 

A professionally used Rolleiflex will reveal complete “brassing of the button ” and significant paint loss on the crank edge.


 
 
I’d recommend staying away from these purchases as they usually require significant tune up costs that can run $ 300-400 ! Unless sold at a dirt cheap price – walk away. There is a large supply of used Rollei’s – be patient and look for a camera with clean paint and a fair price. Lastly, also look for signs that these areas may have been re-painted over to conceal previous paint losses.

 
 



Here is an example of a photo from an ebay auction where the seller calls the camera “mint.” I disagree, the paint loss on the button, while relatively modest, does not qualify it – in my eye – as “mint.”

 

 


All this isn’t rocket science, but it is a reliable and simple way to judge a Rolleiflex just by looking at some photos of this area.

 
 

 
 
 

Email Antiquecameras.net

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:  THIS WEBSITE EARNS COMMISSIONS FROM AMAZON.COM AND EBAY.COM

© Copyright antiquecameras.net, 2022. All rights reserved.

TERMS & CONDITIONS 

PRIVACY POLICY 

SHIPPING & PAYMENT 

RETURN POLICY