Antique & Classic Cameras

Home

Camera Valuations

$ 12 Sample

Valuation Payment Page

Sell Equipment

Lens Vade Mecum

Contact Us

About Us

Prosch Shutters

Blog

Blog84

Blog85

Blog86

Blog87

Blog88

Blog89

Blog90

Blog91

Blog92

Blog93

Blog94

Blog95

Blog 96

Blog 97

Blog 98

Blog 99

Petzval Lens

Voigtlander Lenses

Ross Lenses

Heliar Lenses

Bohmke Lenses

Antique Lenses

Soft Focus Lenses

Soft Focus Lenses 2

Soft Focus Lenses 3

Soft Focus Lens Test

Soft Focus Lens Sales

No 5 Folding Kodak

Rolleiflex

Rolleicords

Rolleiflex Buying Tip

Leica M Lenses

50 Summicron-M Lenses

35 Summicron-M Lenses

Leica 28mm M-Lenses

Leica M Cameras

Leica Screw Cameras

Leica Screw Lenses

Leica Lens Reviews

Leica R Lenses

Sonnar Lens

ROC Universal Camera

Canon RF Lens

Canon 50mm F/1.2 LTM

Canon RF Cameras

Fuji 6x7 & 6x9

Fuji 645 Cameras

Hasselblad 6x6

Hasselblad C Lenses

Pentax 6x7 Lenses

Ricohflex

Nikon RF Lens

Pax Golden View

Zeiss Contax RF Lens

Contax G Lens

Super Ikonta

Minolta-35 RF

Pentax M42 Lens

Bokeh

Fuji 617

Olympus Stylus Epic

Photo History 1888

1876 Scovill Lens Catalog

1890 Lens Catalogue

1892 Steinheil Lens Ads

1892 Zeiss Lens Ads

1904 Dallmeyer Lens Ads

1891 Dallmeyer Lens Ads

1904 Busch Lens Ads

1904 Goerz Lens Ads

Antique Wood Cameras

Photographers 1860-1900

1857 CC Harrison Lens

Harrison Globe Lens

1871 Camera Catalog

1883 Blair Envelope

1895 Sunart Camera

1910 Premo Catalog

1848-1875 Advertisements

Camera Books

Links

Join our E-Mail List

SEARCH

 

A Tip for Buying a Rolleiflex from photographs

A good indicator of Rolleiflex’s amount of previous use is the condition of the original paint on the crank side of the camera. The circular rim around the crank, and on later models, the small “button” are two spots to check to judge a Rolleiflex's general condition. The red arrows highlight typical wear points on a Rolleiflex.




This camera’s wear is indicative of moderate use and handling.

 

As a Rolleiflex is "cranked," the user's hand, thumb, glove – whatever - rubs up against the “button” and the crank's edge. Over time, the repeated friction and abrasion cause paint wear and eventual loss. A minor amount of paint loss can also come from  the camera being taking in and out of the leather case.  In any event, I have found a large correlation between the condition of the paint finish in these two areas and the camera's overall condition. The more wear on that paint, the more likely the camera has been heavily used more and correspondingly, the lower value the camera should be.

A “minty” camera will have absolutely NO paint loss in these areas - in fact, the paint shouldn't show ANY marks or abrasions in the paint at all.  The paint should have an unbroken, beautiful, soft gloss, enamel paint finish.


The paint finish should be impeccable on a minty camera as in this photo =====>


 
 

A professionally, used Rolleiflex will reveal “brassing of the button ” or significant paint loss on the crank edge.


I’d recommend staying away from these purchases as they usually require significant tune up costs that can run $ 300-400 ! Unless sold at a dirt cheap, price – walk away. There is a large supply of used Rollei’s – be patient and look for a camera with clean paint and a fair price. Lastly, also look for signs that these areas may have been re-painted over to conceal previous paint losses. Again, this should negatively effect overall value of the camera.



Here is an example of a photo from an ebay auction where the seller calls the camera “mint.” I disagree, the paint loss on the button, while relatively modest, does not qualify it – in my eye – as “mint.”




All this isn’t rocket science, but it is a reliable and simple way to judge a Rolleiflex just by looking at some photos of this area.



Email Antiquecameras.net


  Please Join Our Mailing List
 





  




FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:  THIS WEBSITE EARNS COMMISSIONS FROM AMAZON.COM AND EBAY.COM


© Copyright antiquecameras.net, 2021. All rights reserved.